Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2012
4.6 (19 votes)

Features

  • Six-speed automatic
  • Two- and four-door versions
  • Permanent all-wheel drive
  • New compact luxury crossover for 2012
  • Turbo four-cylinder power

Bads

  • Narrow cargo area
  • Sleek styling may limit visibility
  • High starting price

Goods

  • Surprisingly roomy cabin
  • Premium interior
  • Appealing design

VIN code search Service: Car Owners In PR

Information about owners of cars: names, addresses, phone numbers and VINs

Edgar Velez

551 VIA GRANDE, CAGUAS, PR 00727-3062

P: (787) 644-8720

VIN: SALVT1BG3CH638206

Edgardo Velez

551 VIA GRANDE, CAGUAS, PR 00727-3062

P: (787) 644-8720

VIN: SALVT1BG3CH638206

Antonio Louk

93 Calle Mendez Vigo W, Mayaguez, PR 00680-2800

P: (787) 562-5684

VIN: SALVR1BG5CH631756

Joaquin Bacardi

81 Calle Viajera, Guaynabo, PR 00969-5810

P: (305) 205-8001

VIN: SALVT1BG7CH624924

Select page:

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2012 Specs

Price
$15,665–$32,509 Inventory Prices
Combined MPG
23 Combined MPG
Engine
240-hp, 2.0-liter I-4 (premium)
Seating
4-5 Seats
Drivetrain
4x4
Body Type
Sport Utility
Warranty Roadside Assistance
48 months / 50,000 miles
Warranty Powertrain
48 months / 50,000 miles
Warranty Bumper-to-Bumper
48 months / 50,000 miles

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2012 Reviews

I loved it. Very stylish and Elegant
5.0

Excellent Vehicle , Never had any problems with it. I used it to transport a family of 4 . It was able to fit 2 car seat , Spaces are tight though you will have to sit in it to appreciate this vehicle...

by nalsam from Dallas on April 24, 2018

first car ever owned, it?s good!
4.6

Good looking, stylish, speedy, compact, good for single or couple without kids. Doesn?t have much storage. Its a decent car! Worth every penny! . .

by Kelvin from chicago on May 15, 2018

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2012 Ratings

  • Total
    4.6 (19 votes)
  • Exterior
    5.0 (19 votes)
  • Perfomance
    4.3 (19 votes)
  • Interior
    4.7 (19 votes)
  • Comfort
    4.6 (19 votes)
  • Reliability
    4.3 (19 votes)
  • Value
    3.9 (19 votes)